Advanced electronic signature (Chile – Peru)

Advanced electronic signature (Chile - Peru)

Certification Practices:

ETSI TS 102 042 V1.1.1 (2002-04).Technical Specification. Policy requirements for certification authorities issuing public key certificates.
NCh2805.Of2003 Information Technology – Requirements for policies of certifying authorities that issue public key certificates.
ETSI TS 102 042 V1.2.2 (2005-06).RTS/ESI-000043.Keywords e- commerce, electronic signature, public key, security.
ETSI TS 102 042 V2.1.1 (2009-05).Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI); Policy requirements for certification authorities issuing public key certificates.
ETSI TS 102 042 V2.1.2 (2010-04) Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI); Policy requirements for certification authorities issuing public key certificates.

Security:

NCh27002.Of2009 Information technology – Code of practice for information security management.
ISO/IEC 15408-1:2009 Information technology – Security techniques – Evaluation criteria for IT security – Part 1: Introduction and general model
FIPS PUB 140-2: Security Requirements for Cryptographic Modules (May 2001).
NCh.2820/1.Of2003 Information technology – Security technique – IT security evaluation criteria – Part 1: Introduction and general model.
NCh2829.Of.2003 Information Technology – Security Requirements for Cryptographic Modules.

Certificate Structure:

ISO/IEC 9594 – 8: 2005 Information Technology – Open Systems Interconnection – The Directory Attribute Certificate Framework. Correction 2:2009.
ITU – T Rec.X.690 (2002) / ISO/IEC 8825-1:2002. ASN.1 Basic Encoding Rules.
NCh2798.Of2003 Information Technology – ASN.1 encoding rules “Specification of the basic encoding rules (BER), the canonical encoding rules (CER) and the distinguished encoding rules (DER).

Information Repository:

NCh2832.Of2003 Information technology – LDAPv2 public key infrastructure operational protocols for the Internet X.509.
RFC 2559 BOEYEN, S. et al., “Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure. Operational Protocols LDAPv2″, April 1999.
RFC 3377 LDAPv3: Technical Specification, September 2002, Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3): Technical.

Time stamping:

ETSI TS 102 023, v.1.2.1 and v.1.2.2.Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI); Policy requirements for time-stamping authorities.
ETSI TS 101 861 V1.3.1 Time-stamping profile.
ISO/IEC 18014-1:2008 Information technology – Security techniques – Time-stamping services – Part 1: Framework.
ISO / IEC 18014-2:2009 Information technology – Security techniques – Time-stamping services – Part 2: Mechanism producing independent tokens.
ISO / IEC 18014-3:2009 Information technology – Security techniques – Time-stamping services – Part 3: Mechanisms producing linked tokens.
RFC 3161 Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Time – Stamp Protocol (TSP) (2001), RFC 5816 (update), ANSI ASC
RFC 3628 Requirements for Times Stamping Authorities.
NIST Special publication 800-102, Sept.2009.

Electronic DNI and its Biometric Identity:

ISO/19.785, ISO 19.794-2 Header and reference data formats.
ISO 7816-4, ISO 7816-11 For the definition of card commands.
ANSI X.9.84 – 2003 – Recognition of signatures, fingerprints.
ISO/IEC 27N2949 – Requirements for biometric systems for the financial services industry.
ISO/IEC 19784-1:2005, also known as BioAPI 2.0. Connection between biometric devices and different types of applications, biometric application programming interface (API).
Common Biometric Exchange Fice Format – common biometric file exchange formats.

Mobile Signature Services:

ETSI TS 102 207 V1.1.3 (2003-08) Mobile Commerce (M-COMM); Mobile Signature Service; Specifications for Roaming in Mobile Signature Services.
ETSI TR 102 206 V.1.1.3 (2003-08) Mobile Commerce (M-COMM); Mobile Signature Service; Security Framework.
ETSI TR 102 203 V1.1.1 (2003 – 05) Mobile Signatures; Business and functional requirements.
ETSI TS 102 204 V1.1.4 (2003-08) Mobile Signature Service; Web Service Interface.

In addition, for the proper use of certificate-based electronic signature policies, the following technical specifications must be taken into account:

ETSI TS 101 733, v.1.6.3, v1.7.3 and v.1.8.1. Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (SEI); CMS Advanced Electronic Signatures (CAdES).
ETSI TS 101 903, v.1.2.2, v.1.3.2 and 1.4.1. Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (SEI); XML Advanced Electronic Signatures (XAdES).
ETSI TS 102 778, v 1.1.2. Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI); PDF Advanced Electronic Signature Profiles;

Part 1: PAdES Overview,
Part 2: PAdES Basic – Profile based on ISO 32000-1,
Part 3: PAdES Enhanced – PAdES-BES and PAdESEPES Profiles;
Part 4: Long-term validation

ETSI TS 102 176-1 V2.0.0 Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI); Algorithms and Parameters for Secure Electronic Signatures; Part 1: Hash functions and asymmetric algorithms.
ETSI TR 102 038, v.1.1.1. Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (SEI); XML format for signature policies.
ETSI TR 102 041, v.1.1.1. Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (SEI); Signature policies report.
ETSI TR 102 045, v.1.1.1. Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (SEI); Signature policy for extended business model.
ETSI TR 102 272, v.1.1.1. Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (SEI); ASN.1 format for signature policies.
IETF RFC 2560, X.509 Internet Public Key Infrastructure Online Certificate Status Protocol – OCSP.
IETF RFC 3125, Electronic Signature Policies.
IETF RFC 3161 updated by RFC 5816, Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Time-Stamp Protocol (TSP).
IETF RFC 5280, RFC 4325 and RFC 4630, Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure; Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile.
IETF RFC 5652, RFC 4853 and RFC 3852, Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS).
ITU-T Recommendation X.680 (1997): “Information technology – Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1): Specification of basic notation”

Hear directly from our valued customers!

Himura Adreas CEO at Manika

After evaluating different alternatives, we decided to integrate Despapeliza's document management platform due to a need to move forward as a company towards digitalization. Thanks to the autonomy in configuration, we have covered different areas of the company, automating internal and external workflows, managing to eliminate paper and save resources. Our users have become accustomed to the ease of the platform, demanding digitalization in more company processes.

Read more
Lucy Rodriguez Administration Leader

Thanks to the ease of use of the solution, we achieved rapid adoption of the tool and reduced signing times from 7 days to just hours in processes of board minutes, committees and commercial agreements. We save 100% of the expenses associated with the transportation of documents and the collection of signatures in different communities, and even outside Santiago.

Read more